Comments for Airport of Sunset http://www.charlielok.net/blog To the freedom and intellectual future Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:39:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 Comment on 一二如何不踏步？ by TranceLove http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=428#comment-590 TranceLove Tue, 01 Jan 2008 09:04:50 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=428#comment-590 = 彭定康在 1995提出的九個立法會功能組別. 參: <a href="http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%96%B0%E4%B9%9D%E7%B5%84" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia的解釋</a> = 彭定康在 1995提出的九個立法會功能組別.

參:
Wikipedia的解釋

]]> Comment on 一二如何不踏步？ by 史界 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=428#comment-589 史界 Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:32:22 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=428#comment-589 請問...甚麼是"pattern的新9組"? 請問…甚麼是”pattern的新9組”?

]]> Comment on 香港配得有民主嗎？ by ~柊~ http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=425#comment-588 ~柊~ Sat, 22 Dec 2007 01:57:02 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=425#comment-588 看到閣下06年的一個entry - "British, may you come back?"，覺得你可能對這個討論區有興趣：www.BritishHONGKONG.com 誠意邀請你加入討論。 看到閣下06年的一個entry - “British, may you come back?”，覺得你可能對這個討論區有興趣：www.BritishHONGKONG.com

誠意邀請你加入討論。

]]> Comment on 香港配得有民主嗎？ by 方潤 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=425#comment-587 方潤 Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:10:19 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=425#comment-587 香港人很過癮的。 刁民那邊有人批評，個個都咁辛苦，只有老師上街嘈。 好像你自動放棄左嘈既權利，我就唔應該去嘈。 點解唔諗下，就係因為你地個個都唔嘈，所以班老闆先奉旨駛死你地﹖ 香港人很過癮的。

刁民那邊有人批評，個個都咁辛苦，只有老師上街嘈。
好像你自動放棄左嘈既權利，我就唔應該去嘈。

點解唔諗下，就係因為你地個個都唔嘈，所以班老闆先奉旨駛死你地﹖

]]> Comment on 香港配得有民主嗎？ by Eric http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=425#comment-586 Eric Sun, 09 Dec 2007 15:17:38 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=425#comment-586 弱者以抗爭行動讓公眾知道他們想說甚麼，通常是強者長期的壓迫迫出來的，但反智的香港人永遠只會看到眼前的「硬暴力」，卻從來想不到「硬暴力」的由來正正是由另一方的「軟暴力」，不知不覺間成了「軟暴力」的幫凶打手 弱者以抗爭行動讓公眾知道他們想說甚麼，通常是強者長期的壓迫迫出來的，但反智的香港人永遠只會看到眼前的「硬暴力」，卻從來想不到「硬暴力」的由來正正是由另一方的「軟暴力」，不知不覺間成了「軟暴力」的幫凶打手

]]> Comment on 香港國際觀 by charlie http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=422#comment-585 charlie Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:36:31 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=422#comment-585 史界：問外國事件與大陸關係肯定沒有問題，但請不要跟筆者說這叫做關心國際事務。 TranceLove：香港政府既然自稱得「亞洲國際都會」，就知道這個城市對國際的心態多麼可笑。 史界：問外國事件與大陸關係肯定沒有問題，但請不要跟筆者說這叫做關心國際事務。

TranceLove：香港政府既然自稱得「亞洲國際都會」，就知道這個城市對國際的心態多麼可笑。

]]> Comment on 香港國際觀 by TranceLove http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=422#comment-584 TranceLove Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:03:26 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=422#comment-584 所謂的國際視野, 還是幌子而已. 當年青人認識得太多, 對擁權者有所懷疑的時候, 就是制度崩潰的序幕. 作為擁權者, 卻是萬萬不想見到的. 對那些傳媒也是一樣. 當讀者的質素都提高了, 起碼香港有一半報紙要結業. 又要馬兒好(要有 "國際視野" + 中國為中心的天朝思想), 又要馬兒不吃草(不要學外國那種容許公民參與的社會+政治制度), 結果就是現在這個爛局. 怎不叫人噴飯? 所謂的國際視野, 還是幌子而已. 當年青人認識得太多, 對擁權者有所懷疑的時候, 就是制度崩潰的序幕. 作為擁權者, 卻是萬萬不想見到的.

對那些傳媒也是一樣. 當讀者的質素都提高了, 起碼香港有一半報紙要結業.

又要馬兒好(要有 “國際視野” + 中國為中心的天朝思想), 又要馬兒不吃草(不要學外國那種容許公民參與的社會+政治制度), 結果就是現在這個爛局. 怎不叫人噴飯?

]]> Comment on 香港國際觀 by 史界 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=422#comment-583 史界 Mon, 05 Nov 2007 13:43:55 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=422#comment-583 但我又咁睇...作為一個中國地方, 分析下外國大選或大件事與中國的關係又唔係冇道理喎...而且, 我又覺得, 認識外國ge大事沒有如自己地方般深, 又未必係等於冇國際視野~~ 但我又咁睇…作為一個中國地方, 分析下外國大選或大件事與中國的關係又唔係冇道理喎…而且, 我又覺得, 認識外國ge大事沒有如自己地方般深, 又未必係等於冇國際視野~~

]]> Comment on 去蔣化 by RL http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=396#comment-544 RL Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:37:33 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=396#comment-544 國民黨去統一是中國對台灣挑釁的後果。 國民黨去統一是中國對台灣挑釁的後果。

]]> Comment on 再思政教（二）：帝國國教 by Achillesferse http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=316#comment-525 Achillesferse Tue, 04 Sep 2007 07:26:17 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=316#comment-525 冇書係手, 唯有用wiki頂住當先, 第日借到書再quote返俾你.... 首先係依段 "Two days after Theodosius arrived in Constantinople, (November 24, 380), Theodosius expelled the non-Nicene bishop, Demophilus of Constantinople, and appointed Meletius to patriarch of Antioch, and appointed Gregory of Nazianzus one of the Cappadocian Fathers from Antioch (which is now Turkey) to patriarch of Constantinople. Theodosius had just been baptized, by bishop Acholius of Thessalonica, during a severe illness, as was common in the early Christian world. In February he and Gratian published an edict that all their subjects should profess the faith of the bishops of Rome and Alexandria (i.e., the Nicene faith). The move was mainly thrust at the various beliefs that had arisen out of Arianism, but smaller dissident sects, such as the Macedonians, were also prohibited." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodosius_I) 然後就... "In 391 Theodosius I established Nicene Christianity as the official and, except for Judaism, only legal religion in the Roman Empire." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity 冇書係手, 唯有用wiki頂住當先, 第日借到書再quote返俾你….
首先係依段
“Two days after Theodosius arrived in Constantinople, (November 24, 380), Theodosius expelled the non-Nicene bishop, Demophilus of Constantinople, and appointed Meletius to patriarch of Antioch, and appointed Gregory of Nazianzus one of the Cappadocian Fathers from Antioch (which is now Turkey) to patriarch of Constantinople. Theodosius had just been baptized, by bishop Acholius of Thessalonica, during a severe illness, as was common in the early Christian world. In February he and Gratian published an edict that all their subjects should profess the faith of the bishops of Rome and Alexandria (i.e., the Nicene faith). The move was mainly thrust at the various beliefs that had arisen out of Arianism, but smaller dissident sects, such as the Macedonians, were also prohibited.”

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodosius_I)

然後就…
“In 391 Theodosius I established Nicene Christianity as the official and, except for Judaism, only legal religion in the Roman Empire.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity

]]> Comment on Liverpool 1-1 Chelsea by charlie http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=415#comment-502 charlie Mon, 20 Aug 2007 07:22:31 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=415#comment-502 Here is the BBC Live commentary http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_prem/6951433.stm <strong>1737:</strong> Back to the action, where it remains 11 v 11. Joe Cole is on for Shaun Wright-Phillips. <strong>1736:</strong> "Send Styles off. Give Styles the red card. This is a joke." And that is just one of the verdicts on the referee on 606. <strong>1735:</strong> Alan Green's still going. "This is breathtaking in its incompetence," he adds of Rob Styles. <strong>1732:</strong> Replays show Michael Essien was booked. The Chelsea man should be off after fouling Alvaro Arbeloa in the 11th minute and he knew it. He held his hands to his head. It looks to be another Graham Poll moment. <strong>1731:</strong> Tal Ben Haim is going apoplectic after blocking Fernando Torres. The Israeli is not going to get a second yellow, but John Terry does for complaining about the Spaniard diving. And has Michael Essien gone in the book? BBC 5live commentator Alan Green thinks so which means he should be off and Green's going as apoplectic as Ben Haim. "This is a pathetic display of refereeing from Rob Styles," he says. ... ... "Mr Styles has just made a massive, massive mistake. Both players were mystified when he pointed to the spot. He was in a fantastic position as well." <strong>Mark Lawrenson, BBC Radio 5live pundit</strong> <strong>1721: GOAL Liverpool 1-1 Chelsea</strong> Frank Lampard was the only Chelsea player to score in last season's Champions League semi-final shoot-out against Liverpool, and he beats Pepe Reina again, sending the keeper the wrong way. <strong>1720:</strong> Penalty for Chelsea after an innocent collision between Steve Finnan and Florent Malouda on the edge of the box. "<font color="red>That's never a penalty in a million years</font>," is BBC Radio 5live pundit Mark Lawrenson's verdict. Here is the BBC Live commentary
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_prem/6951433.stm

1737: Back to the action, where it remains 11 v 11. Joe Cole is on for Shaun Wright-Phillips.

1736: “Send Styles off. Give Styles the red card. This is a joke.” And that is just one of the verdicts on the referee on 606.

1735: Alan Green’s still going. “This is breathtaking in its incompetence,” he adds of Rob Styles.

1732: Replays show Michael Essien was booked. The Chelsea man should be off after fouling Alvaro Arbeloa in the 11th minute and he knew it. He held his hands to his head. It looks to be another Graham Poll moment.

1731: Tal Ben Haim is going apoplectic after blocking Fernando Torres. The Israeli is not going to get a second yellow, but John Terry does for complaining about the Spaniard diving. And has Michael Essien gone in the book? BBC 5live commentator Alan Green thinks so which means he should be off and Green’s going as apoplectic as Ben Haim. “This is a pathetic display of refereeing from Rob Styles,” he says.

… …

“Mr Styles has just made a massive, massive mistake. Both players were mystified when he pointed to the spot. He was in a fantastic position as well.”
Mark Lawrenson, BBC Radio 5live pundit

1721: GOAL Liverpool 1-1 Chelsea
Frank Lampard was the only Chelsea player to score in last season’s Champions League semi-final shoot-out against Liverpool, and he beats Pepe Reina again, sending the keeper the wrong way.

1720: Penalty for Chelsea after an innocent collision between Steve Finnan and Florent Malouda on the edge of the box. “http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=409#comment-416 No comments on the lyrics. But some of voices are quite nice~ 和聲唔錯! No comments on the lyrics.

But some of voices are quite nice~
和聲唔錯!

]]> Comment on 紙紮一國兩制 by charlie http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=407#comment-411 charlie Sat, 16 Jun 2007 17:11:41 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=407#comment-411 謝謝指正 謝謝指正

]]> Comment on 紙紮一國兩制 by 方潤 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=407#comment-408 方潤 Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:17:12 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=407#comment-408 鬧還鬧，要更正一樣野。 政治上「單一制」係相對於「聯邦制」而言，跟「一國兩制」是兩種不同的範疇。 中國是一個單一制國家，但單一制國家也可以有多種制度。 單一制指政治，而非法律。 鬧還鬧，要更正一樣野。

政治上「單一制」係相對於「聯邦制」而言，跟「一國兩制」是兩種不同的範疇。
中國是一個單一制國家，但單一制國家也可以有多種制度。
單一制指政治，而非法律。

]]> Comment on 澳門騷亂（二）：惹火路線 by charlie http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=384#comment-397 charlie Mon, 28 May 2007 13:36:57 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=384#comment-397 隨便 隨便

]]> Comment on 去蔣化 by charlie http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=396#comment-396 charlie Sun, 27 May 2007 15:54:19 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=396#comment-396 臺灣事實上早在一九四九年已為一主權國家，沒有獨立問題、只有正名問題。 臺灣事實上早在一九四九年已為一主權國家，沒有獨立問題、只有正名問題。

]]> Comment on 去蔣化 by Albert Wong http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=396#comment-395 Albert Wong Sun, 27 May 2007 02:45:19 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=396#comment-395 閣下對國民黨在黨綱放棄統一，加入台灣的看法如何？ 本人認為是對大陸的挑釁，而且標誌了台獨已經是單程路了 閣下對國民黨在黨綱放棄統一，加入台灣的看法如何？
本人認為是對大陸的挑釁，而且標誌了台獨已經是單程路了

]]> Comment on 澳門騷亂（二）：惹火路線 by Albert Wong http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=384#comment-392 Albert Wong Mon, 21 May 2007 20:07:36 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=384#comment-392 可唔可以將你的連結貼到那裡，一起建立一個匯集？ http://iamleer.blogspot.com/2007/05/blog-post_07.html 可唔可以將你的連結貼到那裡，一起建立一個匯集？
http://iamleer.blogspot.com/2007/05/blog-post_07.html

]]> Comment on 教徒倒米 by 史界 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=395#comment-390 史界 Mon, 21 May 2007 00:03:12 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=395#comment-390 咁你又講得對ge, 有時我這些教徒的自省能力也許會差一點....要努力...... 咁你又講得對ge, 有時我這些教徒的自省能力也許會差一點….要努力……

]]> Comment on 偽善香港 by charlie http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=389#comment-389 charlie Mon, 14 May 2007 10:01:36 +0000 http://www.charlielok.net/blog/?p=389#comment-389 曉樂> 真對不起，之前把您的回應過濾了。 1> 不能做就不能討論，這是那門子的邏輯？ 閣下所列的一堆規範，筆者只能認同一部分不能做；但為甚麼連別人的討論都要扼殺？有人持不同的的見解，才是最需要討論的空間。不能做就不能討論？討論了就要做？這是那門子的邏輯? 正正是像閣下這樣的思維，整個社會才有禁慾的氣氛；這種禁慾，就造就蘋果東方太陽的意淫報導相當暢銷。人的慾望，就只能從這些畸形方法舒解。 虛偽的確不一定由禁慾而來；但這就等於可以禁慾的嗎？至少，為甚麼解禁來減少虛偽的誘因？美國早在二十世紀三十年初實施禁酒，但帶來的是美國人紛紛轉買黑市酒！更何況，要是禁慾所帶來的高尚道德不會虛偽的話，上帝就不會把善惡樹放在伊甸園內了！ 繼續進行泛道德主義，同類無奚事件只會無日無之。這個問題，只有像閣下這種敢鬧而不敢留名的衛道之士才會認為沒有問題。 曉樂> 真對不起，之前把您的回應過濾了。

1>
不能做就不能討論，這是那門子的邏輯？
閣下所列的一堆規範，筆者只能認同一部分不能做；但為甚麼連別人的討論都要扼殺？有人持不同的的見解，才是最需要討論的空間。不能做就不能討論？討論了就要做？這是那門子的邏輯?
正正是像閣下這樣的思維，整個社會才有禁慾的氣氛；這種禁慾，就造就蘋果東方太陽的意淫報導相當暢銷。人的慾望，就只能從這些畸形方法舒解。

虛偽的確不一定由禁慾而來；但這就等於可以禁慾的嗎？至少，為甚麼解禁來減少虛偽的誘因？美國早在二十世紀三十年初實施禁酒，但帶來的是美國人紛紛轉買黑市酒！更何況，要是禁慾所帶來的高尚道德不會虛偽的話，上帝就不會把善惡樹放在伊甸園內了！

繼續進行泛道德主義，同類無奚事件只會無日無之。這個問題，只有像閣下這種敢鬧而不敢留名的衛道之士才會認為沒有問題。

]]>